Skip to content

CO2 vs Argon for MIG Welding Steel

Tyler O'Brien | 3 minutes | July 17, 2025

For MIG welding steel, a mix of argon and CO₂ generally delivers the best overall results, combining the clean arc of argon with the deeper penetration and lower cost of CO₂.

But the right mix depends on what you’re welding, and sometimes pure CO₂ is the smarter call.

Here’s a quick overview:

ApplicationRecommended Gas
General use75/25 Argon/CO₂
Thin materials or precision work90/10 Argon/CO₂
Thick steel or budget weldingPure CO₂

The 75% Argon / 25% CO₂ mix is the most popular choice because it offers the best balance of performance, cost, and versatility for most steel welding applications.

Argon/CO2 Mixtures: The Best of Both Worlds

The 75% argon/25% CO2 mixture (often called C25) delivers moderate penetration with relatively low spatter and good arc stability. C25 works well across a wide range of material thicknesses (from 16-gauge sheet metal up to heavy structural plates) and joint designs (from simple butt joints to complex multi-pass fillet welds).   

For thin materials or precision work, a 90/10 Argon/CO₂ mix offers a very smooth arc and minimal spatter production. If you’re welding sheet metal under 1/8-inch, this mix keeps you from blowing through while still giving you real penetration.

If you’re welding stainless steel, tri-mix gases (helium, argon, and CO₂) give you better heat control and keep the corrosion resistance intact.

Gas mixtures cost more than pure CO₂, but you’re paying to skip the headaches we’ll cover in a bit.

CO2: Deep Penetration at Lower Cost

CO2 provides deeper penetration than argon, which makes it excellent for welding thicker materials. This deeper penetration results from CO2 partially breaking down in the arc, creating a hotter weld environment with different heat distribution characteristics.

Also, pure CO2 is significantly cheaper than argon-CO2 gas mixtures.

But there are drawbacks to using pure CO2: 

  • CO2 produces significantly more spatter than argon, which calls for additional cleanup time. 
  • The arc is less stable and more turbulent, creating a harsher welding experience.
  • The finished weld bead tends to be wider with more pronounced ripples when using pure CO2

But if the weld holds and nobody’s grading you on looks, the cost savings are hard to argue with.

Choose the Right Gas for Your Projects

Here is a table you can check out now and reference later for help choosing the right gas for your projects:

GasBest forAdvantagesDisadvantages
75% Argon / 25% CO₂General purpose mild steel, structural welding, fabrication workGood arc stability, minimal spatter, excellent penetration, good bead appearance, works well in all positionsMore expensive than pure CO₂
90% Argon / 10% CO₂Thin sheet metal, precision work, spray transferVery smooth arc, minimal spatter, excellent bead appearance, good for out-of-position weldingMost expensive option, less penetration than higher CO₂ mixes
Pure CO₂Heavy structural steel, outdoor/windy conditions, high deposition rate workCheapest option, deep penetration, good for thick materials, less affected by windMore spatter, rougher arc, harder to control, poor bead appearance